Skip to content

Phase 10 · Evidence trail

All components ↑

Outcomes, Evaluation & Continuous Improvement

Evaluate outcomes and decide what to adapt, sustain, scale, or retire.

3 aligned elements · 8 descriptive codes · 209 linked passages · 142 distinct cited works

How the evidence informs this component

The long-run OLPC evaluation is an important counterexample: computer access did not automatically yield the desired educational results. Governance revision and sustainability evidence support learning after launch. The full sustain-scale-retire logic and the timing of returns to earlier phases remain the model’s integrative contribution.

Follow the connections

Model → Master research themes → Themes → Categories → Descriptive codes → Evidence

Master research themes group the connected recorded themes. Master theme, theme, and category definitions are explanatory reading guides. Code definitions reproduce the codebook. Master grouping is a browsing aid. Branches preserve each code’s exact taxonomy; they do not imply a causal or chronological sequence.

Loading this component’s recorded connections…

Descriptive codes & underlying evidence

Select a code to inspect every available cited work and stored passage linked to it. Open a source to read its quotations, citations, documents, and locators.

Why each model element is included

Loading wider quoted source material…
Supporting source perspectives

Supporting source perspectives

8 distinct works in the focused alignment

Wider quoted source material · 209 passages from 142 reference entries

These are the stored quotations attached to this component’s 8 aligned descriptive codes. They broaden the material available for inspection; each passage is not automatically a separate confirmation of every model requirement. The focused argument and element-level alignment remain explicit below.

Open this panel to browse full quotations, citations, source references, and recorded code associations.

Trace 3 elements through codes, categories, themes, and sources

Every code link opens its quotation, source, locator, recorded category, and recorded theme. The final alignment to the model is explained in the rationale column.

Model elementCode & cited sourceReason for alignmentLink type
Evaluate benefits, outcomes, harms, and service impactsDigital Devices(Cueto et al., 2025, PDF p. 2)Algorithmic and AI Bias(OECD, 2025, PDF p. 11)Affordability and Cost Barriers(Hawthorne & Grzybowski, 2025, PDF p. 22)The evaluation and risk excerpts justify examining benefit and harm separately from delivery.Source-linked rationale
Gather user and stakeholder feedbackDigital Public Infrastructure(United Nations Development Programme, 2024, PDF p. 10)Individuals with Disabilities(Connecticut Commission for Educational Technology, 2023, PDF p. 84)Consultation, co-creation, and reported support experience justify feedback.Source-linked rationale
Adapt, improve, sustain, scale, or retireSolution: Public-Private Partnerships(UN-Habitat, 2024, PDF p. 80)Civil Society/NGOs(Kanvaria & Yadav, 2025, PDF p. 1)Digital Devices(Cueto et al., 2025, PDF p. 2)Geographic and Infrastructure Limitations(Hutton, 2022, PDF p. 22)The model combines revision, durability, and outcome learning into a decision cycle.Model synthesis

8 selected excerpts from 8 distinct cited works support this analytical discussion. Link to this component #

Supporting artifacts

Inspect the researcher’s visual development memos →

Research & development records

These collected records offer a complementary research and development trail. Their component and code connections are analytical mappings; each record retains its source role and locator.

Loading connected records…

Inspect source roles and the complete record register →