Closing the Digital Divide
Stakeholders
An evidence-grounded conceptual model connecting people, organizations, stakeholder roles, research codes, research questions, and documented pathways across the United States.
All 50 states
Drag to pan · scroll to zoom · select a node to explore
Geographic evidence
Stakeholders identified by state
Select one or more states to filter both the stakeholder mind map and the state-comparison view. Selected states remain visibly highlighted.
Evidence pathway
From barrier to mechanism
Select a topic to trace its codebook evidence through the three questions that structure the research.
Cross-state comparison
Evidence architecture by state
Compare stakeholder identification, aligned code records, quotation-level evidence, and the themes most visible in each state corpus.
| State | Stakeholders | Codes | Quotes | RQ1 | RQ2 | RQ3 | Most evidenced theme |
|---|
Interpretive caution. Larger counts represent source coverage and coding density–not proof that a state has achieved greater digital inclusion.
Project reference registers
Stakeholders and digital-divide codes
Search the stakeholder taxonomy or move into research codes, definitions, classifications, and quotation evidence.
Method boundary
Evidence and analytical classification remain distinct.
Workbook-explicit: Code labels, definitions, quotations, citations, pages, documents, and research-question assignments are transcribed from the combined codebook workbooks.
Analytically derived: Stakeholder sectors, relationship verbs, population tags, broad topics, and stakeholder-to-code suggestions organize the documented evidence for exploration.